Στάλθηκε από: george_
« στις: Ιανουάριος 23, 2014, 22:32:15 μμ »Δεν τα λέω εγώ; εσύ τα ανέφερες.
Compared to other legendary chronograph movements, such as the Piguet 1185,the Rolex 4130 is arguably lacking in sophistication and fine finishing
Rolex’s adherence to simplicity and practicality of design
Ευχαριστώ τζωρτζ που τεκμηρίωσες την απάντησή σου.γιατί είναι πιο εξελιγμένη ?
Άρα η Ρόλεξ είναι πιο απλή και πιο αξιόπιστη, ενώ η Πιγκέ πιο εξελιγμένη, περίπλοκη και φινιρισμένη (αναλόγως ρολογιού).
Sent from my bed wearing fluffy bunny slippers
Καλα κανεις και παιζουμε κρυφτουλι,καλο κανει,κατι θα μαθουμε παλι!
The 4130 uses 12 different screws versus more than 40 found inside the 4030.
- The 4130 has roughly 20% fewer parts than the 4030, which yes, is a good thing.
- The 4130’s vertical clutch is serviceable, unlike the vertical clutches used by other, competing and very well-known brands. It is routinely re-lubricated during servicing, but can be disassembled and repaired as well. The alternative, unserviceable vertical clutches, are untouched during servicing. They’re reinstalled as is, and become, in the words of an experienced watchmaker friend, “basically time bombs which will, of course, eventually fail”.
- The 4130’s mainspring can be replaced without taking the movement out of the case. A 4030, on the other hand, requires a full overhaul in order to replace the mainspring.
- All of the 4130’s chronograph parts are on the movement side – only one eccentric (e.g., difficult) is required. The 4030, with three horizontal clutches spanning both sides of the movement, requires up to five different eccentric adjustments to function properly.
- The 4130’s automatic winding mechanism winds 68% more efficiently than the 4030’s, and is equipped with more reliable reversers compared with the 4030, which uses a complicated reverser that is prone to sticking.
Many respected watchmakers will confirm: The caliber 4130 set a new benchmark among high-end, self-winding chronograph movements.
.hodinkee
